A personal carbon budget will clip our wings
they encourage you to do something you know is probably bad, but terribly hard
to resist. Why bother with the high street or the shopping centre when you can
fly to New York for the weekend for less than you will spend on designer “bargains”?
If you like culture rather than retail, then hop on a flight to Rome, or Prague,
or Madrid to check out the galleries.
can inflict your raucous stag night on the inhabitants of some newly-discovered
“cheap” destination city? Cheap flights encourage us to be greedy, to load up
our personal goodie bags with foreign experiences and hot weather. Scottish winters
are a downer, so why not buy a second home in some more clement foreign spot,
a possibility only made feasible because some budget airline has struck up a deal
with the local mayor and chamber of commerce to attract foreign cash using cheap
flights as bait.
has in mind when he talks of the “right to fly”. While the environmental lobby,
recognising the role of aviation in fuelling global warming, calls for fiscal
disincentives, Miliband seems intent on drumming up business for the Ryanairs
and easyJets of the world. Rather alarmingly, given his job title, he intends
to exclude aviation from government measures to reduce carbon dioxide emissions
by 80% by 2050, because he thinks it would be unfair if only rich people could
afford to fly.
“People … have benefited from … foreign travel which, 40 years ago, only the
middle classes took for granted,” he says, in apparent ignorance of Department
for Transport statistics which show that just 10% of the UK’s population takes
half of all the flights from these shores. And we’re not talking here about the
blokes that empty our bins. According to the Aviation Environment Federation,
the average yearly household income of passengers using Stanstead, hub for budget
airlines, is £47,000.
who aren’t short of a bob or two. First at the check-in desk are those who never
for a second consider the train or bus alternatives, even for trips within these
They are filled with nice, respectable, decent citizens who consider themselves
too busy, too important or too posh to get a train or a bus, many of them business
people or academics who could easily convene their meetings by email or conference
call. Only a tiny minority of regular plane users have a legitimate excuse, such
as age or infirmity. After all, navigating airports – queues, long walks etc
– presents a challenge to all but the most able-bodied.
notional economic benefits that tourism brings to countries and communities, such
as the Maldives, that have little else to offer than their climate and natural
environment. The irony here is that these atolls are in the front line for disappearing
under sea level if global warming continues unabated. The Maldives cannot welcome
the heavy carbon footprint of plane-loads of 21st-century tourists without conniving
in its own downfall.
Indies in Barbados. He was adamant that his island’s environment could not cope
with Costa del Sol or Cancun-style mass tourism. Only rich people’s tourism,
he said, was beneficial to countries like his. If you are loaded enough to check
into the famous Sandy Lane Hotel, where some 800 staff service the high-spending
occupants of 112 rooms, then you’re helping the local economy by way of employment.
pensions, or frugal backpackers who make a virtue out of spending as little as
possible. Brutal though it may be to hear it, the world’s most fragile spots need
small numbers of rich tourists, not plane-loads of canny middle-class bargain-hunters
arriving on budget flights, ticking off countries on some “must-see” list as they
to “1974 levels of flying”, which is probably what needs to happen if we are serious
about tackling this fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions. And if
we care about social equity, then giving every citizen a carbon budget is the
obvious way to achieve that. Like other bad habits, addiction to cheap flights
is hard to give up, so we need to be saved from ourselves.