Stop Stansted Expansion response to the Airports Commission final report
The Commission’s main recommendation is that there should be a 3rd runway at Heathrow. Further, the Commission believes that there may be sufficient demand to justify one other additional runway in the UK by 2050. However, the Commission emphasises that this would also need to be justified on economic and environmental terms and that no decisions should be taken until the impacts of the 3rd Heathrow runway have been independently evaluated. In SSE’s view the need for additional runways in the UK has been greatly exaggerated by the aviation industry. Business travel has been declining for 15 years and now accounts for less than a sixth of all international travel from UK airports. The new runway would stifle the growth prospects for airports elsewhere in the UK, and make it virtually impossible for the UK to meet its climate change targets. It therefore seems inevitable that there will be a series of legal challenges to the Commission’s recommendations. On Stansted the Commission just says: “…there may be a case for reviewing the [35 mppa] planning cap if and when the airport moves closer to full capacity. Its forecasts indicate that this would not occur until at least the 2030s”.
.
Tweet
Stop Stansted Expansion (SSE) response to the Airports Commission final report
1.7.2015 (SSE)
This morning the Airports Commission, led by Sir Howard Davies, published its Final Report after almost three years of independent analysis and investigation.
It is now for the Government to consider the Commission’s recommendations, and it could be as late as December before the Government announces its final decisions.
The Commission’s main recommendation is that there should be a third runway at Heathrow. Further, the Commission believes that there may be sufficient demand to justify one other additional runway in the UK by 2050. However, the Commission emphasises that this would also need to be justified on economic and environmental and that no decisions should be taken until the impacts of the new Heathrow runway have been independently evaluated.
Whilst Stop Stansted Expansion (SSE) is obviously relieved that the Commission has not recommended an extra runway at Stansted, it has never been part of SSE’s policy to seek to transfer the problems associated with major airport expansion onto the doorsteps of the communities living around other airports.
In SSE’s view the need for additional runways in the UK has been greatly exaggerated by the aviation industry. Business travel has been declining for 15 years and now accounts for less than a sixth of all international travel from UK airports. Moreover, the total number of flights (business and leisure) from UK airports has grown less than 1 per cent over the past 15 years.
If additional runway capacity is provided in the South East it will stifle the growth prospects for airports elsewhere in the UK. In addition it will make it virtually impossible for the UK to meet its climate change targets. It therefore seems inevitable that there will be a series of legal challenges to the Commission’s recommendations.
So far as Stansted is concerned, the Commission simply states that:
“…there may be a case for reviewing the [35 mppa] planning cap if and when the airport moves closer to full capacity. Its forecasts indicate that this would not occur until at least the 2030s”.
This is in line with what the Commission said in its Interim Report and it will, of course, be dependent upon demand. Stansted currently caters for 21.5 million passengers per annum (mppa) which is exactly the same throughput as 10 years ago and so it is clear that there is currently no case for raising the existing planning cap of 35 mppa.
SSE Chairman Peter Sanders said: “Ten years ago Stansted was first in the queue for a new runway to serve London. Today’s report marks a remarkable turnaround and that must come as a great relief to our local community.”
Peter Sanders continued: “There is no doubt that the Commission has examined the issues conscientiously and in painstaking detail but for the reasons given above we disagree with many aspects of the Report.”
Peter Sanders concluded: “It looks as if it will be the end of this year before the Government makes its final decision(s) and having regard to the likelihood of legal challenges, there may well be a longer period of uncertainty. Whatever the timescale, SSE will continue to play a full part in the debate for as long as it takes to ensure that no-one is allowed to ride roughshod over the interests of this local community.”
ENDS
NOTES TO EDITORS
- The Airport Commission’s final report is available on the Commission’s website at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/airports-commission-final-report
- It was almost three years ago – 7 September 2012 – when the Government announced that it had appointed Sir Howard Davies to chair an independent Commission tasked with identifying and recommending options for maintaining the UK’s status as an international hub for aviation. The Commission’s terms of reference required it to report no later than summer 2015 on:
- Its assessment of the options for meeting the UK’s international connectivity needs, including their economic, social and environmental impact;
- Its recommendation(s) for the optimum approach to meeting any needs; and
- Its recommendation(s) for ensuring that the need is met as expeditiously as practicable within the required timescale.
- SSE has engaged fully with the Commission from the outset and has made a total of ten separate evidence submissions as well as a presentation to the Commission at a public evidence session, the only local community group to have been invited to do so.
- SSE warmly welcomes the Commission’s recommendations for an independent noise ombudsman and for a noise levy to be charged for each passenger using an airport with the proceeds used to support local environmental and community projects.
- Today’s confirmation by Sir Howard Davies that there is no case for an extra runway at Stansted is the same conclusion as reached on each of the three previous occasions when Government allowed an independent body to consider airports policy for the South East. Each time – Blake in 1966, Roskill in 1971, Eyre in 1984 – it was concluded that Stansted should not be developed beyond the capacity of its existing single runway.
info@stopstanstedexpansion.com
.
.
.
Essex County Council say second runway at Stansted Airport ‘inevitable’ in next 20 years
By Harlow Star
1.7.2015
The leader of Essex County Council Cllr David Finch believes a second runway after 2030 at Stansted Airport may be an “inevitable” option.
“We support Stansted owner’s ambitions to introduce greater destinations and long-haul flights, and we believe Stansted should be an important airport of trade and commerce as well as for short breaks and holidays. Sensible growth at Stansted can benefit the UK and the Essex economy,” said Cllr Finch.
“Stansted Airport is one of the many factors that make Essex the place to be and one of the many factors why Essex Means Business.”
Cllr Finch’s Stansted second runway prediction related to long-term growth, post 2030, but in the short to medium term he called on the Government to act on the recommendations of today’s (Wednesday) Airport Commission report to build a third runway at Heathrow first.
Cllr Finch said: “We hope the Government doesn’t kick this report into the long grass. We have always said that UK plc cannot sit on this issue forever.
“We believe a third runway at Heathrow is the most viable option now. It’s affordable, practical and consolidates Heathrow’s position as the UK’s central airport.”
The county also supports “sensible growth” at Stansted in the short to medium term – but is calling for rail connections to the airport to be improved.
In the 12 months from May 2014, airport passenger numbers grew by 3.8m passengers per annum.
While Stop Stansted Expansion (SSE) admitted it was relieved Sir Howard Davies’ recommendations did not include immediate building at Stansted, the campaign group questioned the need for any new runways at all.
It argued the aviation industry had exaggerated demand, claiming business travel has been declining for 15 years and now accounted for less than a sixth of all international travel from UK airports. Moreover, the total number of flights (business and leisure) from UK airports has grown less than one per cent over the past 15 years.
SSE chairman Peter Sanders said: “Ten years ago Stansted was first in the queue for a new runway to serve London. Today’s report marks a remarkable turnaround and that must come as a great relief to our local community.
“There is no doubt that the commission has examined the issues conscientiously and in painstaking detail but…we disagree with many aspects of the report.
“It looks as if it will be the end of this year before the Government makes its final decisions, and having regard to the likelihood of legal challenges, there may well be a longer period of uncertainty. Whatever the timescale, SSE will continue to play a full part in the debate for as long as it takes to ensure that no-one is allowed to ride roughshod over the interests of this local community.”
.
.
.