The Scottish government insists the new runway will have major economic benefits for Scotland. [That is what Heathrow told them ….. see below].
UK Transport Secretary Chris Grayling announced on Tuesday that the Heathrow expansion had been chosen as the government’s preferred option ahead of a rival bid by Gatwick.
The Scottish government formally backed the Heathrow bid after the airport made a list of commitments to Scotland, including creating up to 16,000 jobs and investing £200m in the country.
Heathrow also said it would help to develop new domestic routes to Scottish airports, and would investigate whether Prestwick Airport – which is owned by the Scottish government – could be used as a “logistics hub” for the new runway.
Speaking at First Minister’s Questions, Mr Harvie said Scotland’s commitment to climate justice apparently “doesn’t apply to people living under the flight paths at Heathrow”.
He said a third runway would cause a quarter of a million extra flights a year and a massive increase to emissions – which he said was the single biggest threat to the whole of the UK meeting its climate change targets.
It would leave thousands of people’s homes too noisy and too polluted to live in, and unknown tens of thousands more left suffering the damaging health effects, Mr Harvie claimed.
Mr Harvie described Heathrow’s estimate of 180,000 jobs created by the plans as “pie in the sky” and “about as believable as the job projection figures for Donald Trump’s golf course”.
Referring to the presence of Heathrow representatives at the recent SNP conference in Glasgow, he said: “We’re not surely going to fall for this are we? What were the Heathrow bosses putting in the drinks at SNP conference?”
She said: “On the economy there’s the potential for significant construction spend in Scotland and thousands of jobs.
“In the nearer term there is potential for a supply chain hub at Prestwick, which is extremely important in terms of economic impact and jobs, a £10m route development fund, a reduction starting in January in passenger charges that will make service between Scotland and Heathrow much more viable and a new marketing campaign as well.
“These are the reasons on which our decision was based.”
The first minister also said Scotland had a “strong record” on meeting climate change targets and had shown “global leadership” by including aviation emissions in reduction targets.
She added: “These will always be difficult decisions to strike, and difficult balances to strike, but meeting our climate-change targets but also ensuring we have the infrastructure to enable our economy to grow and support jobs – these are not mutually-exclusive objectives.”
Scottish Government backs third runway plan
10/10/2016 Scottish Government website
The Scottish Government has announced its support for plans to build a third runway at London Heathrow Airport, after securing key commitments for Scotland.
- The creation of up to 16,000 new jobs across Scotland from the new capacity.
And then after the Heathrow announcement on 25th October, with lower economic benefit claims, no mention of those jobs:
Lord Ahmad outlines benefits of Heathrow expansion to Scotland
26.10.2016 (DfT press release)
“A new runway at Heathrow would boost jobs across the UK, lead to more flights and better connections, and link Scottish businesses to expanding global markets, Aviation Minister Lord Ahmad said at Glasgow Airport today”.
[No indication of thousands of jobs ….]
Net Present Value (NPV)
The measure used by the DfT and the Airports Commission for the future benefit to the UK of a new runway is NPV. (Net Present Value). A definition of NPV can be found here.
The flimsy little 4 page paper on which the claims of jobs etc is based is by “Quod” and is at