Heathrow vast consultation starting 18th June – aiming to be done less badly than earlier consultations

Heathrow has announced the dates of its forthcoming consultation on the expansion it wants. The consultation will start on 18th June, and end on 13th September (ie. much across the summer holiday period, when responding is more difficult …). Unlike the consultation that started in January and ended on 4th March, this one is statutory – something Heathrow has to do, by law. It will cover a large range of issues. Perhaps in response to the highly critical comments on its earlier consultations, Heathrow says: “Having listened to feedback from previous consultations, Heathrow will be holding events in more locations than previously and, in addition to an extensive national publicity campaign across newspapers, radio, billboards, digital and – for the first time – Spotify, will be contacting 2.6 million households directly in the vicinity of the airport with a leaflet encouraging participation.” Paul McGuinness, Chair, No 3rd Runway Coalition said:  “This consultation is about  the infrastructure Heathrow will build once they’ve demolished villages in Hillingdon. Not the serious environmental impacts of imposing a further 700 planes a day over the country’s most populated region.”  Or the devastating impact on air pollution, carbon emissions etc.

.

Comment from the No 3rd Runway Coalition, on the announcement:

Commenting on the announcement of the statutory consultation on Heathrow expansion, Paul McGuinness, Chair, No 3rd Runway Coalition said:
.
“This consultation is about the the infrastructure Heathrow will build once they’ve demolished villages in Hillingdon. Not the serious environmental impacts of imposing a further 700 planes a day over the country’s most populated region.
.
Heathrow’s claim that this consultation, which runs through the summer holiday season, will be their ‘most innovative engagement yet’ sets a low bar. Just as their boast to hold events in more locations than ever, acknowledges their failure to consult widely enough in the past.
.

They claim ‘transparency’ and that this consultation will include ‘consolidated feedback’ from the Airspace exercise, earlier in the year. So let them publish it, warts and all. Because residents were horrified by their airspace change proposals and incandescent at the loaded, prescribed questions – which far too many felt didn’t allow them to express their real views.”

.


Save the date: launch day set for statutory consultation on Heathrow expansion

15.5.2019  (Heathrow press release)

  • Heathrow’s statutory consultation on its expansion plans will commence the 18th of June and end on the 13th of September
  • New CGI imagery released to show what an expanded Heathrow could look like
  •  June consultation follows an extensive period of non-statutory consultation and engagement

Heathrow has announced that its statutory 12 and a half-week consultation on its expansion plans will launch on the 18th of June. This step is the latest delivery milestone for the critical national infrastructure project, and the responses received will feed into a final planning application. To mark the news, the airport has released a series of new images showing an illustrative example of a new terminal infrastructure, as well as a panoramic shot of a future Heathrow.

The airport’s June consultation will be its largest and most innovative engagement exercise yet. Heathrow has invested in new technology to show the public its current proposals, including a model of the future airport which uses augmented reality, and a sound booth to be used at certain locations which features virtual reality to demonstrate the effect of noise insulation on properties overflown by aircraft.

Having listened to feedback from previous consultations, Heathrow will be holding events in more locations than previously and, in addition to an extensive national publicity campaign across newspapers, radio, billboards, digital and – for the first time – Spotify, will be contacting 2.6 million households directly in the vicinity of the airport with a leaflet encouraging participation.

The consultation follows the High Court’s dismissal of legal challenges against Heathrow expansion. The debate on Heathrow’s plans – and its commitments to grow sustainability – has been had and won, both in Parliament and now in the courts.  [Four of the five legal challengers are now appealing and will, if necessary, take their claims to the Supreme Court. The High  Court judges looked only at process, declining to comment much on content. So the legal objections continue, because the ANPS was flawed due to the absence of necessary information. AW comment]

Heathrow has consistently demonstrated best practice by holding additional consultations at earlier stages of its project development to ensure feedback is incorporated in its plans, and to be as transparent as possible about its emerging proposals. The plans revealed in this consultation include the consolidated feedback received in the Airspace and Future operations consultation that concluded in March, and previous consultations last year, as well as from Heathrow’s continuous engagement with local communities, local authorities, airlines, and other interested parties.

The upcoming consultation will seek feedback on four key areas:

Heathrow’s preferred masterplan for expansion: our proposals for the future layout of the airport including the runway and other airport infrastructure such as terminals and road access. The masterplan will also reveal the airport’s growth in phases – from runway opening in 2026, to the end masterplan in approximately 2050. This incremental growth in infrastructure will align more closely with forecast passenger growth, and help airport charges remain close to 2016 levels – ultimately resulting in more affordable fares for passengers;

Plans to operate the future airport: how the future three runway airport will be operated, including important elements such as night flights, as well as how potential additional flights before the new runway opens could be operated on our existing two runways;

Assessment of impacts of the airport’s growth: our preliminary assessment of the likely impacts of expansion on the environment and local communities;

Plans to manage the impacts of expansion: we will set out the airport’s plans for mitigating the effects of expansion, including property compensation, our Noise Insulation Policy, a Community Compensation Fund, and measures to mitigate against air pollution, carbon, and other environmental effects

Inviting people to participate in the consultation, Emma Gilthorpe, Heathrow’s Executive Director for Expansion, said:

“Heathrow’s expansion is a project of huge national and local significance, and it is critical to our country’s economic growth. An expanded hub airport will allow the country to access more of the world, create thousands of jobs locally and nationally and it will open up new trading routes. But we can’t deliver these plans alone. We urge everyone to have their say in this consultation, to shape our plans, and to help us deliver expansion in the fairest and most sustainable way.”

Following the conclusion of this consultation and after feedback has been incorporated, Heathrow will submit a final proposal to the Planning Inspectorate in 2020, kickstarting its approvals process. The decision on whether to grant the DCO will be made by the Secretary of State following a public examination period led by the Planning Inspectorate.

Notes to Editors:

For more information on the planning process for Heathrow expansion, please visit: https://www.heathrowexpansion.com/the-expansion-plan/planning-process/

 

http://mediacentre.heathrow.com/pressrelease/details/81/Expansion-News-23/11085

.

.


Who holds Heathrow to account to produce an adequate consultation?

The Planning Inspectorate (PINS) doesn’t have responsibility to ensure the consultation is understandable – that ultimately lies with Heathrow in this case.
However, it is the Councils who can – in their Statement of Community Consultation – hold the scheme promoter to account and complain about the size or legibility of the consultation.
PINS can then dismiss an application if they believe that the consultation was poorly done or not consulted widely enough. This could also prove sufficient grounds for another JR if the application is approved.
.
.

.