Supreme Court reserves judgement on ruling about UK air quality

On 6th March there was a one-day hearing in the Supreme Court in London on the UK’s failure to meet legal limits for air quality. In parts of London the air pollution standards are regularly breached, putting the health of thousands of Londoners is at risk. It is not only in London that there are air pollution problems but in 16 UK regions. It is thought there are some 29,000 early deaths per year in the UK caused by air pollution, a higher number than those from obesity and alcohol combined. The UK government has not met the EU standards on nitrogen dioxide emissions and in London it is unlikely that clean air targets will be met until 2025, 15 years late. The environment charity, ClientEarth, argued in the Supreme Court that the national courts must enforce EU environment law in the UK. It is understood that the European Commission is encouraging the Supreme Court case because it would prefer to avoid a direct confrontation with the UK, which is objecting to other EU environmental rules. However, If the Supreme Court does not require action, the European Commission must. After the 6th March hearing, the court reserved judgement. However, Client Earth hopes this will be handed down before Easter.

 


 

8 March 2013 (BBC)

By Roger Harrabin, Environment analyst

Air pollution
The government admits that air quality laws will be breached in 15 regions up to 2020

The Supreme Court has reserved judgement on the UK’s breaches of EU air pollution laws.

The government admits air quality laws will be breached in 15 regions until 2020.

Londoners will have to wait until 2025 for pollution to enter legal limits.

Pollution levels in affected areas are a health risk to people on many of Britain’s busiest streets, especially those with heart or lung problems.

The government says the laws are unrealistically strict.

The BBC understands that it also believes the European Commission is partly to blame because it did not set proper limits on pollution from diesel exhausts in the first place.

The High Court and later the Court of Appeal refused to take action on the issue, ruling that enforcement was a matter for the European Commission.

An environment charity, ClientEarth, will now argue in the Supreme Court that the national courts must enforce EU environment law in the UK.

About 29,000 early deaths each year in the UK are blamed on air pollution – more than obesity and alcohol combined (although air pollution tends to shorten people’s lives by a shorter time).

Pollution from road traffic, particularly diesel fumes, is the most significant cause of poor air quality in most cities. The pollutants of most concern are tiny airborne particles, “PM10s”, and nitrogen dioxide.

Alan Andrews, for ClientEarth, told BBC News: “It’s a disgrace that we won’t achieve compliance by 2020 or 2025 – and it’s made worse that the British government is lobbying to weaken the limits because it claims they are unrealistic.”

BBC News understands that the European Commission is encouraging the Supreme Court case because it would prefer to avoid a direct confrontation with the UK, which is objecting to other EU environmental rules.

The timing for the government is unfortunate. This week it was forced to issue a severe pollution warning on air quality in London, with some pollution monitors registering 10/10.

Simon Birkett, Founder and Director of Clean Air in London, said: “If the Supreme Court does not require action, the European Commission must.”

A Defra spokesman said: “Our air quality has improved significantly in recent decades and most of the UK meets EU air quality limits for all pollutants. Our plans for nitrogen dioxide set out all the important work being done to meet EU standards in the shortest possible time.”

The government says it has tried to reduce emissions of nitrogen dioxide through tax breaks and subsidies for low emission vehicles. It has invested £75m to support green bus technologies and £560m for local sustainable transport and given around £3m in grants to local authorities every year since 2010 to help them tackle pollution on a local level.

However, the government’s drive to reduce CO2 emissions blamed for changing the climate has partly contributed to the problem, by encouraging drivers to turn to diesel vehicles.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21691784

 

.


 

.

Supreme Court hears case on UK’s illegal air pollution – response

March 7 2013 (Client Earth press release)

The Supreme Court has heard ClientEarth’s case against the Government for failing to meet legal limits for air quality.

Alan Andrews, ClientEarth lawyer, says: “The Judges were clearly convinced of the serious health implications of allowing air pollution to continue unabated. It was also apparent that the case raised a fundamental question about the rule of law. If the Supreme Court is unable to give an effective remedy to a clear and admitted breach of EU environmental law, there are grave constitutional consequences. There is now the distinct possibility that this will be referred to the European Court of Justice.

“Judgement has been reserved and we are hopeful this will be handed down before Easter.”

The case was brought to make the Government take action to reduce air pollution, a public health issue that causes 29,000 early deaths each year – more than obesity and alcohol combined. Air pollution also stops children’s lungs from growing properly and is linked to low birth weight in newborns.

 http://www.clientearth.org/201303082134/news/press-releases/supreme-court-hears-case-on-uks-illegal-air-pollution-response-2134

.


 

.

UK Government faces Supreme Court over illegal air pollution

March 4 2013

•    ClientEarth’s case against the Government for failing to meet legal limits for air quality will be heard by the Supreme Court on Thursday 7 March 2013.

•    This landmark case could lead to the Government being forced to take action to drastically reduce air pollution, a public health issue that causes 29,000 early deaths each year – more than obesity and alcohol combined.

James Thornton, ClientEarth CEO, says: “Air pollution is an invisible killer that causes heart attacks and strokes, stops children’s lungs from growing properly and is linked to low birth weight in newborns.”

“For too long, the government has got away with failing to protect the public’s health from air pollution, and we have the right to take them to court to demand action. Our government is lobbying in Brussels to try to weaken current air quality laws instead of coming up with an ambitious new plan to clean up the dirty diesel vehicles which are choking our towns and cities.”

The case concerns 16 regions, (including London, Manchester and Birmingham), where  government plans will fail to achieve legal limits until up to 15 years after the 2010 deadline, endangering the health of thousands. Levels of pollution on some of Britain’s busiest streets are currently double legal limits.

ClientEarth, an organisation of activist environmental lawyers, originally took this case to court in December 2011, forcing the government to admit that it was breaking EU air quality laws. However, the High Court and later the Court of Appeal refused to take action, ruling that enforcement was a matter for the European commission.

The appeal to the Supreme Court, which hears only cases which are “of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population” was supported by a letter from the European commission firmly supporting ClientEarth’s interpretation of the EU air quality directive.

Professor Richard Macrory of University College London, one of Britain’s top environmental lawyers, says: “This is one of the most significant cases to come before British courts in recent years,” adding “It would be disastrous if the principle were upheld that, when there is a breach of EU law, it should be solely left to the commission, rather than the national courts, to deal with.”

Weather forecaster and Healthy Air Campaign Ambassador Clare Nasir says: “It is outrageous that the Government needs to be dragged through the courts to get them to tackle this issue. Air pollution is so bad in some of our cities that it is affecting the lung capacity of our children and causing heart attacks and strokes. Shouldn’t that be enough?”

“I want my daughter to grow up in a country where we have the right to breathe clean air. I just hope this case helps to make that a reality.”

——–

Notes:
–    Obesity and alcohol are each estimated to be responsible for 9,000 premature deaths per year. See table 2.1 in this recent report.

–    Government lobbying to weaken air quality laws: Defra’s Red Tape Challenge Implementation Plan includes ‘Working in partnership with other Member States (MSs), use the EC review of air quality legislation to seek amendments to the Air Quality Directive which reduce the infraction risk faced by most MSs, especially in relation to nitrogen dioxide provisions’.

–    Pollution from road traffic, and particularly diesel fumes, is the most significant cause of  poor air quality. The two pollutants of most concern are microscopic airborne particles, known as ‘PM10’,  and nitrogen dioxide.

–    The World Health Organisation has classified diesel exhaust fumes as carcinogenic for humans, based on evidence that exposure is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer.

–    Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) is a gas caused by road traffic and other combustion processes. NO2 is harmful to health and associated with early death, hospital admissions and respiratory symptoms. (See P23, point 3)

–    ClientEarth leads the Healthy Air Campaign, a coalition of health, environment and transport groups working to tackle the public health threat caused by air pollution. The campaign calls for a strong public voice to oppose the UK Government’s regressive stance on air quality.

–    2013 has been declared the “Year of Air” by the EU, which is overhauling all its air pollution laws. The World Health Organisation is calling for stricter standards to protect health.

–    ClientEarth’s challenge relates to 16 air quality plans which fail to achieve compliance by 2015. Compliance with NO2 limits is predicted to be 2025 for Greater London and 2020 for the following: West Midlands Urban Area, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Teeside, The Potteries, Kingston Upon Hull, Southampton, Glasgow, Eastern England, South East England, East Midlands, North West & Merseyside, Yorkshire & Humberside, West Midlands and North East England. Source

http://www.clientearth.org/201303042129/news/press-releases/uk-government-faces-supreme-court-over-illegal-air-pollution-2129

.


.

 

( A judge reserving judgement means that they do not make an immediate decision but instead retire to consider the case further, and make their judgement at a later time. )

they did not make their judgement on the case at the end of the 1-day hearing yesterday – in fact the government has till next Friday to respond to a note Client Earth’s team presented at the hearing, then i am not quite sure what happens.

The 5 judges will probably also need to look up/consider some of the references that were mentioned yesterday and discuss the case as they were probably not all agreed on what their judgement should be
One possibility is they could refer it to the EU court of justice apparently
The Client Earth press release from before is here
http://www.clientearth.org/201303042129/news/press-releases/uk-government-faces-supreme-court-over-illegal-air-pollution-2129
there’s more on Alan views beforehand here
http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2252843/client-earth-and-defra-set-for-supreme-court-air-quality-showdown
The Friends of the Earth press release is at:
http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/govt_legal_challenge_air_quality_06032013.html

1. Friends of the Earth is a partner in the Healthy Air Campaign, which is led by Client Earth:
3. Friends of the Earth signed up to a joint letter of 60 NGOs (dated 4th March) urging the EU to take a strong line in its air quality “Year of Air” review as consultation closed:
4. Kings College London studied the varying levels of personal exposure different street users have, such as those in a vehicle versus those cycling and walking:
5. The Mayor’s environment advisorecently said children may need to be kept indoors and out of playgrounds at times of bad air pollution

,


 

.

Earlier:

 

12 areas in UK refused reprieve on air quality standard by EU (not Heathrow)

27 June 2012Government plans to delay air pollution improvements in 12 UK areas have been refused by the European Commission, which says air quality must improve. The UK may now face fines if it fails to improve air quality quickly. Government figures show air pollution reduces life expectancy by up to 8 months, mainly from lung problems. The pollution mainly comes from road vehicle, and around airports, a large proportion of the air pollution comes from the roads.  A judgement will be made at a later date on government plans to delay meeting NO2 standards in major cities until 2020 – or in the case of London, 2025. London has the worst air of any European capital, and the UK is likely to be fined over the failure. http://www.airportwatch.org.uk/?p=2457 

and

 

EU urged to crack down on air pollution in ‘year of air’ – Supreme Court case on the UK in March

08 Jan 20132013 is the European Year of Air in which EU air pollution policy will be revised. However, the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) NGO is highlighting a new poll by the EU’s public opinion analysts, Eurobarometer, showing that 72% of EU citizens think public authorities are not doing enough to promote good air quality. As many as half a million premature deaths may be partly due to poor air quality, and that has associated economic costs. The EEB is specifically calling on the EU to tighten legal standards for PM2.5, as these currently fall below those recommended by the WHO.  Many EU member states are breaching existing air pollution limits, including the UK. The UK is facing a Supreme Court case in March 2013, over its failure to draw up a strategy to ensure the UK meets legal limits for NO2 by 2015, when activist legal group, ClientEarth, will again seek to force the Environment Secretary to improve the government’s plans to tackle NO2. There are 40 UK zones, of which 16 would not comply until 2020, while London would not meet the limits until 2025. Pollution is particularly bad around Heathrow.  http://www.airportwatch.org.uk/?p=850