EU Parliament votes to clamp down on carbon-neutral claims backed by offsetting
The European Parliament voted late last week to support new rules to improve product durability and combat greenwashing. The proposal for a new directive on empowering consumers for the green transition was voted in plenary by an overwhelming majority of 544 votes in favour, 18 against and 17 abstentions, opening the way for talks with EU member states to finalise the law. Tabled in March last year, the directive aims to help consumers make environmentally friendly choices and encourage companies to offer them more durable products. “This proposal aims to strengthen the fight against greenwashing by banning practices that mislead consumers on the actual sustainability of products,” EU Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders told MEPs. Lawmakers introduced a ban on environmental claims based on carbon offsetting schemes, such as ‘CO2 neutral’ or ‘carbon neutral’, which are criticised by environmental groups for misleading consumers. Campaigners hailed the Parliament’s move, which was not included in the European Commission’s draft proposal tabled last year.
.
Tweet
EU Parliament votes to clamp down on carbon-neutral claims backed by offsetting
Businesses wishing to label their products as ‘carbon neutral’ within the EU are set to face new regulatory barriers, after the European Parliament voted in favour of new anti-greenwashing rules.
15th May 2023
Edie
EU Parliament votes to clamp down on carbon-neutral claims backed by offsetting
The European Parliament voted late last week to support new rules to improve product durability and combat greenwashing.
The proposal for a new directive on empowering consumers for the green transition was voted in plenary by an overwhelming majority of 544 votes in favour, 18 against and 17 abstentions, opening the way for talks with EU member states to finalise the law.
Tabled in March last year, the directive aims to help consumers make environmentally friendly choices and encourage companies to offer them more durable products.
“This proposal aims to strengthen the fight against greenwashing by banning practices that mislead consumers on the actual sustainability of products,” EU Justice Commissioner Didier Reynders told MEPs during the Parliament’s plenary session in Strasbourg.
“By doing so, consumers can choose products that are generally better for the environment. This will encourage competition towards more environmentally sustainable products,” he added.
The draft directive bans the use of generic environmental claims such as ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘natural’, ‘biodegradable’ or ‘eco’ if they are not supported by evidence. Other misleading practices, such as making green claims about the whole product when only one part is sustainable, will also be forbidden.
Crucially, it will only be possible to use sustainability labels based on official certification schemes recognised or established by public authorities.
Clampdown on offsetting-backed climate claims
In a bold move, lawmakers introduced a ban on environmental claims based on carbon offsetting schemes, such as ‘CO2 neutral’ or ‘carbon neutral’, which are criticised by environmental groups for misleading consumers.
Campaigners hailed the Parliament’s move, which was not included in the European Commission’s draft proposal tabled last year.
This is “a significant victory for consumers and the environment,” said the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), a green organisation.
“We urge the Council and the Commission to support this ban,” added Carbon Market Watch. “If the other institutions do not shift their position during upcoming negotiations, it will undermine the EU’s ability to genuinely crackdown on this kind of greenwashing,” it said.
Product durability
The EU Parliament also voted against early obsolescence by banning the introduction of design features that limit a product’s life or lead to goods malfunctioning prematurely.
Moreover, producers will not be allowed to restrict a product’s functionality when used with spare parts or accessories produced by other companies.
To encourage companies to prioritise durability, MEPs also suggested introducing a new guarantee label that indicates the mandatory guarantee lengths and any potential extensions manufacturers offer.
“Citizens need to be properly informed, and their legal rights must be protected and strengthened. We are enabling citizens to choose products that are more durable, repairable, and sustainable,” stated Socialists & Democrats MEP Biljana Borzan, the lead Parliament speaker on the proposal.
With the Parliament’s position now decided, talks to finalise the law can begin with the 27 EU member states represented in the EU Council of Ministers. The Council adopted its negotiating mandate on 3 May, and Borzan said the upcoming negotiations will be “rather short and quite constructive.”
Valentina Romano, EurActiv.com
.
See also:
Climate groups taking government to High Court over greenwash “Jet Zero” aviation strategy
In July 2022, the UK government published a “Jet Zero” strategy (the best part of which is the catchy name). It aspires to allow the UK airline sector to continue to grow, with unrealistic hopes of being able to decarbonise with novel fuels. It was widely condemned at the time as being greenwashing, with no credible ways to achieve its goals, and its steadfast refusal to contemplate measures to reduce the demand for flights. Two organisations, GALBA and Possible, challenged the government. In October 2022, with lawyers at Leigh Day, Possible filed for a judicial review of the “Jet Zero” strategy. They now have permission to proceed to a joint hearing. This is a hugely important milestone in climate change litigation in the UK. Experts have judged the plans in Jet Zero to be inadequate, and lawyers will argue that the failure to consider this risk to the delivery of its plans renders its net zero aviation strategy unlawful. The key grounds on which the challenge will be heard in the High Court are: The government failed to lay a report before Parliament setting out how the strategy would enable carbon budgets to be met. And the government failed to consult in a lawful manner by having a “closed mind” before the consultation commenced on whether demand management measures were required.
.
.
EU considering plans law to force companies to prove green claims are real – not greenwash
The European Union has drafted plans to make companies back up green claims about their products with science-based evidence, in an attempt to fight greenwashing and misleading advertisements. The draft legal proposal by the European Commission aims to clamp down on companies promoting their products as “climate neutral” or other “green” claims unless these can be substantiated. There would have to be proper methodology that tracks environmental impacts of all sorts, including air pollution and CO2 emissions. Currently most green claims are woolly, vague and misleading, and customers are buying products based on unreliable information. Under the proposal, companies that claim their product has a positive environmental impact must also disclose if this causes an negative impact in another area. Claims based on promises of future environmental performance must be backed up by milestones the company will achieve by specific dates, including if carbon offsets are to be used. There is currently no law against greenwashing in the UK, but the Financial Conduct Authority consulted in October 2022 about greenwash claims made for financial products, as it said the financial services sector was a major culprit. As is the air travel industry.
.
.
.
.