T: 020 7248 2227           E: info@airportwatch.org.uk 

Aviation and Noise

Noise Briefing Sheets

1.  Aircraft noise - an introduction

Noise is the major problem for most communities living around airports and under flight paths, especially at night. Aircraft noise has been an issue ever since the introduction of the first jet aircraft, since when the benefits of progressive technological improvements have tended to be offset by the introduction of larger aircraft, more frequent movements (often at sensitive times of day) and growing community expectations.

The Government’s official noise index averages out the noise throughout the day: it measures the noise of each aircraft (i.e. the sound energy, in decibels, that each aircraft movement produces) and averages the total out over a 16 hour day to get what is known as an equivalent continuous noise level (abbreviated as LAeq). This has been criticised on two counts. Firstly, the average includes the periods in the day when there are no aircraft noise events at some airports. And, secondly, many people argue that, in assessing the noise, insufficient weight is given to the incidence of aircraft noise events. Because individual planes have got quieter over the last 20 years, the Government and industry can claim that noise exposure contours have shrunk, when the reality is that noise remains as much of an issue today as it has ever been, if not more, as the number of noise events has substantially increased.

The Government claims that "the onset of significant community annoyance" starts when the noise from aircraft averages out at 57 decibels, known as 57dB(A) LAeq. The World Health Organisation (WHO) puts the figure between 50 and 55 decibels (and about 10 decibels lower at night). On this basis, it recommends maximum noise exposure levels of 55 dBA Leq to avoid the risk of people being significantly annoyed.

There is little prospect of significantly quieter planes being introduced over the next 20 years. The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) has set a tougher standard for new aircraft noise that will come into force until 1 January 2006. However, the standard is already met by 98% of aircraft currently in-production. ICAO also agreed that there should be no global phase-out of existing “Chapter 3” aircraft to speed up the transition to quieter aircraft. This means that the sort of expansion envisaged in the Aviation White Paper will inevitably lead to more people across the country being exposed to higher levels of noise (a fact proven by the Government’s own noise calculations).

Looking to the future: Nobody – even within the aviation industry – claims that the level of expansion envisaged in the Aviation White Paper will not result in noise becoming a bigger problem for a greater number of people. The only way to avoid an increase in noise problems would be to reduce the number of aircraft movements, or to see a step-change in the noise of individual aircraft. Neither is on the cards. The Government’s approach has been tacitly to accept that the noise climate will get worse and try to lessen the blow for those worst affected through the compensation and mitigation measures that airports are expected to provide. But these schemes are far from generous and are not on offer to the vast majority of people affected by aircraft noise.

 

2.  Complaining about noisy and off-track aircraft:

If you have complaints about noise, or of planes away from set flight paths, you can complain to your local airport management (check who is the appropriate manager to write to).

Copy your letter to us at AirportWatch,* or copy your local campaigning organisation.

Send a copy to the DfT:  Martin Capstick, Aviation Environmental Policy, Department for Transport, Great Minster House, 76 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DR

* AirportWatch, 2nd Floor, Broken Wharf House, 2 Broken Wharf, London  EC4V 3DT   
(email.  sarah@airportwatch.org.uk)

 

3. Effects of Aircraft Noise on Children’s Cognition and Long Term Memory:

February 2000 - report from California

Effects of Aircraft Noise on Children’s Cognition and Long Term Memory

 

4.  Children's reading and memory affected by exposure to aircraft noise:  

Paper from Queen Mary, University of London.  June 2005.
  

Effects of Aircraft Noise on Children’s Cognition and Long Term Memory

  

5.  AirportWatch held a conference entitled "Aircraft Noise - a widespread and growing problem", in London on 27th October.

The following background papers were produced for delegates.
 
A number of background briefing papers were provided for the conference. 
 
Briefing Paper 1
Aircraft Noise - the extent of the problem 
 
Briefing Paper 2
Aircraft Noise - the noise climate is getting worse 
 
Briefing Paper 3
How aircraft noise is measured and the flaws 
 
Briefing Paper 4
Aircraft Noise - European Developments 
 
Briefing Paper 5
Aircraft Noise - World Health Organisation 
 
Briefing Paper 6
Aircraft Noise and Health 
 
Briefing Paper 7
Aircraft Noise - how to complain 
 
Briefing Paper 8
Aircraft Noise - Campaigning 
 
 
One individual's personal experience - an account 
"Continuous Descent Approach into Depression"
 

More documents from the conference will be available from this page shortly.

 

6.  Planning Policy Guidance 24: Planning and Noise

This is the Government guidance on noise.  A summary of the document can be found on the Communities and Local Government website. 

Planning Policy Guidance 24: Planning and Noise

 

7.  European Action

The European Union published its Noise Directive in 2002. This requires member states to draw up noise maps (for ambient noise – aircraft, traffic, rail and construction sites) by 2007 and then produce action plans for dealing with the noise in the worst-affected areas by 2008. DEFRA takes the lead on this for the UK Government. It is behind schedule in drawing up its maps and plans. To a storm of criticism from those who want independent measuring and mapping, the aviation industry is heavily involved in drawing up the noise maps and action plans for airports. Unlike the Air Pollution Directive, the Noise Directive does not included targets to be met. But it will be revised after 2007. Campaigners are arguing that firm targets, with a timetable for implementation, should be included in a revised Directive. The other key document is the Charter on transport, environment and health which acknowledges the WHO guidelines on noise. Over 50 countries worldwide (including all EU countries) have signed up to these guidelines. The Aviation White Paper sees them as aspirational, maybe to be reached in 30 years time!
 

 8.   Two articles from Wikipedia:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise_health_effects     Noise Health Effects (Wikipedia)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_noise     Aircraft Noise (Wikipedia)
 
 

9.  Noise demystified - useful bits and pieces of background from different sources

  Aircraft Noise Deymystified LAeq etc

 

  
  
  

 

 

In the Aviation and Noise Section

Noise and Human Health

Site under construction - there will be papers and publications on the effects of noise on human health

Noise Briefing Sheets

Site under construction - there will be a selection of briefing sheets on aircraft noise

This section will soon contain information on how to complain about aircraft noise

 

Latest Aviation and Noise Information:

General noise briefing

Aircraft Noise - an introduction

Effects of Aircraft Noise on Children’s Cognition and Long Term Memory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright AirportWatch, 2004