Top Civil Servant, Sir Jeremy Heywood, ‘warned ministers not to comment’ on Heathrow runway issue before conference

It appears that the whole issue of building a new runway is so fraught that the UK’s most senior civil servant, Sir Jeremy Heywood, wrote to government ministers in the run up to the party conference season, warning them against speaking out about it. Sir Jeremy’s email said Ministers could repeat statements they had made before the report was published on 1st July, but urged them to keep quiet now. It was received by some with deep irritation. Laura Kuenssberg (BBC) said a cabinet minister told her it was “unprecedented”. The Cabinet Office said they would not comment on leaked documents, but the anxieties in government are real and are twofold. (1). There are concerns over any comments making the final decision more vulnerable to a legal challenge – tying up the decision in the courts for years to come. (2).There is significant political opposition around the cabinet table, including from Boris Johnson. Theresa May would not comment on the leak, but told the BBC that the story was a “mountain out of a molehill”. The PM and the chancellor have promised to make a decision by Christmas, but that promise won’t be easy to keep. Though AirportWatch and the Aviation Environment Federation did have a stall at the Conservative conference, there were difficulties in getting it approved.

.

Heathrow third runway: civil service chief ‘warned ministers not to comment’

Sir Jeremy Heywood’s intervention appears to reflect concerns that ministers’ remarks could make final decision vulnerable to legal challenge

Artist’s impression of how Heathrow could look with a third runway. The government is due to deliver its formal response before Christmas to the commission’s recommendation to construct a third runway.
Artist’s impression of how Heathrow could look with a third runway. The government is due to deliver its formal response before Christmas to the commission’s recommendation to construct a third runway. Photograph: Heathrow Airport/PA

 

Britain’s most senior civil servant warned ministers not to speak out publicly over proposals to build a third runway at Heathrow before the Conservative party conference, it has been reported.

Sir Jeremy Heywood, the cabinet secretary, wrote to ministers in the runup to the party conference season to caution them about commenting in public on the issue, according to the BBC.

In his email, Heywood is said to have told them that while they could repeat statements made before the Airports Commission issued its final report in July, they should refrain from further comment.

His intervention would appear to reflect concerns that remarks by ministers could make the final decision vulnerable to a legal challenge.

Theresa May would not comment on the leak, but told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday that the story was a “mountain out of a molehill”.

The home secretary said it was correct that ministers should not be interfering in the decision on a third runway at Heathrow by making public comments.

The commission’s report – recommending the construction of a third runway – is highly controversial, with a number of ministers such as development secretary Justine Greening strongly opposed to the plan, as is the mayor of London, Boris Johnson.

Johnson, who is an MP but not a minister, did not refrain from commenting on Heathrow. He used his speech at the Conservative party conference to say: “If we are going to build new airport capacity, let’s not bodge it with one runway in the wrong place in a short-termist and environmentally disastrous solution.”

The government has said that it will deliver its formal response to the commission before Christmas.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/19/heathrow-third-runway-civil-service-chief-warned-ministers-not-to-comment

.

Also

However Labour MP Andy Slaughter, whose Hammersmith constituency lies under the Heathrow flight path, said it was “disgraceful” that ministers with constituencies directly affected by the decision were barred from speaking out.

“This is going to be subject, if Heathrow does get approval, to ligation over a number of years anyway. It is going to be judicially reviewed,” he told the Today programme.

“Cabinet ministers have been muzzled on this. I think it is disgraceful that they can’t speak up on behalf of their constituents.

“There is so much pressure coming from (Chancellor) George Osborne and others within the Government to go for Heathrow. I think that they just want to bulldoze the proposal through.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/aviation/11939974/Ministers-told-to-keep-quiet-on-Heathrow-expansion.html

and 

Home Secretary Theresa May confirmed that ministers were avoiding public comment on the issue but defended the stance.

“This is an important decision and it is right that Cabinet ministers are not speaking about it publicly until the decision is taken,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“It is absolutely right that Cabinet ministers do not say anything that could prejudice the decision that is taken and lead to judicial review.”

Bracknell MP Phillip Lee was this evening due to tell a Commons debate that Heathrow should expand but that local communities should be given far better noise insulation and other mitigation measures.

Lord True, Tory leader of Richmond council, was also critical of Sir Jeremy’s intervention.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/sir-jeremy-heywood-accused-of-muzzling-cabinet-ministers-over-airport-expansion-a3093706.html


 

Heathrow Airport expansion: A ‘toxic dilemma for ministers’

“Toxic” is how one minister described the government’s dilemma over Heathrow.

In fact, the whole issue is so fraught that the country’s most senior civil servant, Sir Jeremy Heywood, wrote to government ministers in the run up to the politically-charged conference season, warning them against speaking out.

Sir Jeremy’s email said they could repeat statements they had made before the report was published in July, but urged them to keep quiet now.

It was received by some with deep irritation.

Map showing proposed new runway at Heathrow

One cabinet minister told me it was “unprecedented”. Other ministers believe the letter illustrates the political sensitivity of the decision.

The Cabinet Office said they would not comment on leaked documents, but the anxieties in government are real and are twofold.

There are concerns over any comments making the final decision more vulnerable to a legal challenge – tying up the decision in the courts for years to come.

And there is significant political opposition around the cabinet table, including from the London Mayor, Boris Johnson.

Decades of dithering

He, along with others, is all too ready to remind David Cameron of his own vow in 2009, “no ifs, no buts”, ruling out a third runway at Heathrow.

But the business community is eager for a decision to be made, after decades of political dithering.

And the government, particularly the chancellor, have made big promises about pushing ahead with big infrastructure decisions, even citing the Airports Commission as an example of how the case for major projects should be independently made.

But resistance to Heathrow is passionate and powerful. The prime minister and the chancellor have promised to make a decision by Christmas, but that promise won’t be easy to keep.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34568530

.

.


 

Though AirportWatch and the AEF (Aviation Environment Federation) had a stall at the Conservative Party Conference, earlier in October, they had considerable difficulty in getting this permitted. After an initial acceptance of the booking, the conference organisers then said it would not be possible for the stall to be at the conference. No reason was given.  Several weeks later, and after the intervention of several MPs, the stall was given permission. However, passes were only sent out two days before the conference, and John Stewart (Chair of Hacan) was refused a pass, on the day before the conference – leaving no time to appeal. This makes more sense, now this comment by Sir Jeremy Heywood, has been revealed.


 

Major airports in selected European countries

Passenger numbers and runway layout 

http://www.theguardian.com/world/datablog/2015/jul/02/heathrow-two-runways-other-airports-europe-compare