Heathrow local residents pledged to oppose high-speed rail unless 3rd runway is dropped

11.3.2010   (NoTRAG press release)

Local residents around Heathrow, whose communities are threatened by the third
runway, have pledged to oppose any high-speed rail schemes unless plans for the
new runway are dropped.

Geraldine Nicholson, the Chair of NoTRAG (No Third Runway Action Group), said,
"If the Government thought it was going to get plaudits from us for its plans,
it is sorely mistaken. What we want to see is a high speed rail scheme that goes
all the way to Scotland; a scheme that is designed to make it easy for people
to use the train instead of the plane. We will oppose any scheme that does not
involve the dropping of the third runway."

The Government’s scheme, unveiled today, only has detailed plans for a route
as far as Birmingham. It was put together by High Speed 2, a government quango
headed up by Sir David Rowlands, formerly Permanent Secretary at the Department
for Transport and now Chairman of Gatwick Airport.

Both the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have said that they favour high-speed
rail instead of a third runway. Both parties have said they will drop plans for
a third runway if they win the forthcoming General Election.

Geraldine Nicholson said, "If the Government thought it would win green brownie
points with this announcement, it has failed dismally."

ENDS

 
http://www.notrag.org/
 
 
see also
 
 

High-speed rail plans to be published by government

 
BBC   11.3.2010
 

Plans for a new high-speed rail network, featuring 250mph trains, will be published
by the government later.

A White Paper will recommend a route for a new line between London and Birmingham
with a future extension to northern England and Scotland.

The public will be consulted on the proposed route, with work unlikely to start
until 2017 at the earliest.

Network Rail chief executive Iain Coucher said high-speed rail “can drive economic
growth and boost jobs”.

The main opposition parties are also committed, in principle, to the need for
a high-speed rail network.

However, reaching the necessary political consensus for a particular route may
prove to be difficult ahead of the general election.

Mr Coucher said high-speed rail was “a vital part of a modern, dynamic economy”.



Like many people, we’re yet to be convinced that the overall business case for
HS2 – the high-speed line – stacks up environmentally, financially and socially



Patrick Begg, National Trust

He also said that it would “take cars and lorries off the road, cut domestic
flights and release capacity on the existing rail network, transforming services
even for those communities not served directly by a high-speed line.

“It is the low-carbon, sustainable transport of the future.”

Michael Roberts, chief executive of the Association of Train Operating Companies
(Atoc), said: “The commitment that all three parties have shown to HSR [high-speed
rail] is a vote of confidence in the industry, and will help place train travel
at the heart of a successful low-carbon economy.

Public consultation

“The plans must be affordable at a time of real constraint in the public finances
and must show how HSR will be paid for while continuing to invest in the existing
network on which passengers make more than a billion journeys a year.”

For the past year, the government-backed company High Speed Two has been working
on plans to develop a new high-speed rail network, initially between London and
Birmingham.

Transport Secretary Lord Adonis will make public a report produced last year
by the company detailing where this route would be built and whether it would
go via London’s Heathrow airport.


FROM THE TODAY PROGRAMME





He is expected to announce that 1,100-seater HSR trains will arrive and depart
from a new London station, with the route of the line likely to pass through the
picturesque Chiltern Hills to Birmingham.

The new line could cut the journey time between the cities to just 46 minutes.

Bob Crow, general secretary of the RMT union, said: “We welcome any move to expand
the rail network and to bring more passengers on to the trains.

“However, development of HSR in the UK has been left in the slow lane because
of our fragmented, privatised system which puts short-term profits first and long-term,
strategic planning a very poor second.”

Environmental impact

Patrick Begg, director for the National Trust’s Thames and Solent region, said
the proposed route could cause “serious and significant impacts on the landscape”
of the Chilterns.

He added: “We’re taking a keen interest in how these impacts have been considered
and assessed, particularly exploring the government’s proposals for mitigating
against these impacts through design and tunnelling.

“Like many people, we’re yet to be convinced that the overall business case for
HS2 – the high-speed line – stacks up environmentally, financially and socially.”

Geraldine Nicholson, the chairwoman of No Third Runway Action Group (NoTRAG),
which is opposed to Heathrow Airport expansion, said: “If the government thought
it was going to get plaudits from us for its plans, it is sorely mistaken.

“What we want to see is an HSR scheme that goes all the way to Scotland, a scheme
that is designed to make it easy for people to use the train instead of the plane.

“We will oppose any scheme that does not involve the dropping of the third runway.”
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8561286.stm