Council Leader says Hounslow will ‘fight to the last’ to prevent mixed mode at Heathrow

Hounslow Council have voiced their opposition  to a report by York Aviation saying that using mixed mode on both Heathrow runways would, allegedly ” boost UK economy by £206 million a year” from 2023,  They say mixed mode is not acceptable and Hounslow residents will not tolerate losing their half days of relief from plane noise.  The report was commissioned by the City of London Corporation and business pressure group London First, which are both keen to seen aviation expansion – both in the short term, and in the longer term by adding a new runway. They do not appear to be concerned about the level of noise this would subject Londoners to.  At present there is (most of the time, except for when the A380 lands and in other situations) one runway is used for arrivals and one for departures, with the roles switching at 3pm each afternoon to ensure some respite for those under the flight paths. 80% of Hounslow residents are in favour of keeping runway alternation. Hounslow Council’s deputy leader Colin Ellar said: “We will fight to the last to protect our residents from being subjected to more aircraft noise. While Heathrow is very important to us economically, the introduction of mixed mode flies in the face of a better airport.”
.

 

We will ‘fight to the last’ to prevent mixed mode at Heathrow

11 Feb 2014 (Get West London)

Using both runways concurrently for landings and take-offs is not acceptable, says Hounslow Council, as new research claims it could help boost economy by £206 million a year

A fresh call to introduce ‘mixed mode’ at Heathrow, ending the half day of peace enjoyed by households under the flight paths, has been attacked by Hounslow Council.

A report commissioned by the City of London Corporation and business pressure group London First recommends allowing planes to use both runways at the airport for landings and take-offs simultaneously, known as ‘mixed mode’.

The research by York Aviation suggested mixed mode, coupled with other short term measures, could boost the British economy by £206 million a year from 2023.

However, mixed mode would spell the end of runway alternation, under which one runway is used for arrivals and one for departures, with the roles switching each afternoon to ensure some respite for those under the flight paths.

Hounslow Council’s deputy leader Colin Ellar said: “We will fight to the last to protect our residents from being subjected to more aircraft noise. While Heathrow is very important to us economically, the introduction of mixed mode flies in the face of a better airport.

“The overwhelming majority of our residents, some 80 per cent, are in favour of runway alternation which gives our residents some respite, but it would be lost if mixed mode is introduced.

“The Airports Commission has said it will not introduce mixed mode and Heathrow has made the same commitment.”

York Aviation researched the potential impact of all the short-term measures initially considered by the Airports Commission to improve aviation capacity in the UK.

The commission’s interim report, published shortly before Christmas, shortlisted three options for a new runway: two at Heathrow and one at Gatwick.

It also appraised a number of more immediate solutions, including the possibility of mixed mode at Heathrow, which it opposed because of the impact on the airport’s neighbours.

Heathrow has previously said it has no plans to introduce mixed mode, which the commission estimated could allow up to 60,000 extra flights at the airport each year.

 

http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/news/local-news/we-fight-last-prevent-mixed-6696451

 

,


.

Earlier:

 

Heathrow bid to end Cranford Agreement – allowing easterly take-offs from northern runway – is rejected by Hillingdon Council

February 12, 2014

The Cranford Agreement was a binding commitment the UK government made in 1952 to the residents of Cranford to reduce the impact of aircraft noise on residents. It prohibits, under normal Heathrow Airport operations, easterly take-offs (i.e. towards central London) on the northern runway. In January 2009, the government announced it was ending the Agreement (as part of consultations on a proposed Third Runway). In September 2010 the current UK government reaffirmed the decision to end the Cranford Agreement. A planning application by Heathrow airport in June 2013 concerns the creation of taxiways on the Northern Runway, required to enable the practical implementation of the ending of the Agreement as well as consideration of the associated environmental impacts. It also included the erection of a 5m high noise barrier around parts of the village of Longford. This application has now been unanimously rejected by Hillingdon Council – which means Heathrow will not be able to have regular departures to the east from the northern runway. This preserves the 60-year-old gentlemen’s agreement protecting Cranford residents from the noise. The downside is that people living in Windsor and Maidenhead continue to endure more landings. Heathrow is considering whether to appeal.    Click here to view full story…

 

“London Councils” – representing 32 London boroughs & councils – calls for an end to night flights from 2017

February 5, 2014

“London Councils” is a cross-party organisation which represents London’s 32 borough councils and the City of London and works on behalf of all of its member authorities regardless of political persuasion. It has responded to the 2nd stage of the government’s consultation on night flights from Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted by repeating its call for a total ban on night time flying from 2017. At present there is no ban on flying from the three airports at night but a limit on take-off and landing is in place. At Heathrow this is currently 2,550 in winter and 3,250 in summer. Councillor Catherine West, Chair of London Councils’ Transport & Environment Committee, said: “Night flights are an unacceptable part of the capital’s airport operations. This consultation is disappointing as it discusses keeping the current system, or extending the time period of the restrictions. It does not allow a proper assessment of the economic or health implications of banning night flights, which is what the majority of our residents want.” London Councils believes night flight noise is a serious well-being issue and has a big impact on quality of life for ordinary Londoners. “Any new technical and operation procedures could help, but ultimately communities across the capital would like a ban on night flights from 2017.”    Click here to view full story…

 

Heathrow consultation starts – 140,000 leaflets distributed – as airport hopes to minimise opposition on noise increase

February 3, 2014

Heathrow airport has started its 6-week consultation, to ask people living near the airport how they can “improve” on their runway plans – and reduce opposition to it as much as possible. The airport is sending out 140,000 short (12 page) booklets, to many neighbouring boroughs, but not Richmond (where there is fierce opposition). The thrust of the consultation is on noise. It is extremely simplistic, and should not really be considered as a proper consultation. Except for people motivated to write a lot of their own text, there is no simple way to say “No, we do not support a new runway” in the consultation response form itself. There are no questions along those lines. The form only has two questions – the first asking respondents to rank a list of criteria; the second asking if people think it is more important to have fewer communities living under flight paths affected more badly, or more communities affected a bit less. There is stunningly little detail. Colin Matthews says: “This consultation is to make sure we correctly understand what local people value and that we can take their views into account as we refine our proposal.” Everyone with an interest in Heathrow and its runway plans should reply to the questionnaire, and tell Heathrow just what they think, in the space for responses in Question 3. The consultation ends on 16th March.   Click here to view full story…

 

.

.

.